Texas transportation officials have been working on a plan since April to get $1 billion in highway projects going in El Paso in the next three years.
Because political disagreements over funding methods kept those project proposals from reaching Austin, they were considered by some to be decades off or lost altogether.
The plan, which the El Paso City Council approved this morning, calls for local contributions of $216 million in coming years through tolled highways and the diversion of city and possibly county tax dollars from future development along a completed Loop 375.
The plan was unveiled Monday in the Paso del Norte Group’s conference room for members of the Borderland Mobility Coalition by Texas Transportation Commissioner Ted Houghton, Mayor John Cook and Harold Hahn, chairman of the Camino Real Regional Mobility Authority. [View a map of the plan and list of projects via the links below the story.]
“The bottom line is we’ll end up putting down $1 billion worth of transportation mobility projects that would probably have taken 25 or 30 years to complete,” said Hahn, president of the Rocky Mountain Mortgage Co.
But, Houghton said, the plan will have to be approved at several levels by start of the state’s fiscal year Sept. 1.
It will require the approvals by City Council, the regional mobility authority, the Metropolitan Planning Organization’s Transportation Policy Board on Friday and the Texas Transportation Commission at its Aug. 26 meeting in Austin.
City Council will have to agree to the establishment of a transportation reinvestment zone, never before used in Texas, that would generate an estimated $65 million in diverted taxes from new commercial and residential development.
“What will also happen is this will spur development for commercial projects along these corridors, that haven’t been built yet,” Cook said. “That’s the argument that I have to convince the council makes sense.”
He said the El Paso County Commissioners Court may also be called upon to create a road utility district, which would operate summarily to the city’s transportation reinvestment zone.
The utility district could generate as much as $40 million in property tax revenues that would be diverted for transportation projects outside the city.
And the regional mobility authority, in order to draw down $151 million in advanced funds from the state, would have to agree to charge tolls on two new lanes in the middle of the Cesar Chavez Border Highway, two new lanes completing the loop from Downtown to Sunland Park Drive and four new lanes connecting a realigned Schuster to I-10 and West Paisano.
In addition, the MPO’s Transportation Policy Board, whose members are familiar with the proposed plan, must accept the projects at its meeting Friday.
“That has to fall in place,” Houghton said, referring to the MPO, which has opposed the use of road tolls by the regional mobility authority.
Those agreements, Houghton said, would result in the dedication of hundreds of millions of dollars by the state – money El Paso has stood to lose because of its resistance to state policy requiring heavy contributions by communities to future transportation projects.
If the approvals do fall in place, he said, construction work could begin by the end of December using expedited design-and-build contracts.
“This is very historic,” Cook said, “because we’re digging into pots of (state) money and dedicated sources of revenue we’ve never seen before.
“When these projects are done, we’ll no longer have the distinction of being the only major city in Texas without an outer loop. That’s been one of the major criticisms of our transportation infrastructure. We’re wholly reliant on I-10 for moving goods, services and passengers.”
Included in the plan are millions for highway beautification and $27 million from the state that would be matched with federal funds to advance the establishment of a bus rapid transit system corridor on North Mesa to Doniphan and on Montana.
Supporting the financing and construction projects is state Rep. Joe Pickett, D-El Paso, whom the Transportation Advisory Board is expected to elect as its new chairman on Friday, succeeding Cook.
Pickett vigorously opposed the establishment of the Camino Real Regional Mobility Authority several years ago along with the state’s new policy of requiring communities to finance their highway projects with toll roads because the state contended it no longer had the money to do so.
In the last session of the legislature, Pickett’s amendment to the transportation bill allowed the establishment of transportation reinvestment zones.
El Paso is now poised to become the first city in Texas to use that legislation.
Pickett said it wasn’t the use of toll roads he opposed before so much as the extent to which the state intended to lean on local communities to pay for the kinds of highway projects the state traditionally financed.
“If we had taken their plan two years ago, we would have had these onerous tolls and no money to do anything,” he said Monday.
Houghton said the transportation commission recognized this spring that El Paso, Fort Worth and Austin had fallen behind in highway appropriations because political differences over controversial funding issues in those communities kept them from coming forward with new projects.
As a result, they stood to lose hundreds of millions of dollars headed for other cities that were more aggressive.
Starting in April, highway officials and planners from around the state began working with El Paso leaders and the MPO to come up with a plan to put El Paso’s delayed projects at the top of the state’s priority list.
“We’re behind, way behind,” Houghton said. “Now we’ve got to move fast. Fast.”
If El Paso moves quickly, he said, a secondary list of transportation projects could be approved using non-traditional financing means as well.
***
To reach David Crowder, write to dcrowder@epmediagroup.com or call (915) 351-0605
Related Documents:
David K
July 22, 2008
I think this idea that we have to have a "loop" around El Paso is a farce. A bypass - cool. A true loop? Somebody better start talking to Juarez becaues we're going to need a lot of their land to build a "loop."
We are limited by our border with Mexico. Where as Houston has a loop that surrounds the City's center (downtown) and covers north, south, east and west, El Paso's loop won't. We only have a north, east and west. We're stuck with a triangle instead of a loop.
I don't care if we are the only city in Texas without a loop. We have something better - a triangle. I'm damn proud of our triangle.
C
July 22, 2008
Please read and explain to me.
DJ
July 22, 2008
I was very confused by David K's "loop" comments. Then I figured out he must not travel on highways much.
Clearly, in many places a city bypass of the US Interstate Highway system is called a "loop" if it rejoins the main highway. If it only goes off in one direction then dead-ends onto other surface roads, it's called a "spur".
There is even a three digit numbering standard that tells you if it is a loop or a spur. Loops get even first digits added to the highway number, spurs get an odd first digit.
In a very few cities, like Houston, the loop completely circumnavigates the city and joins multiple direction highways and in this case it's routinely called a "beltway" but it's still a loop.
The AASHTO, the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, is the standards setting body that determines these protocols and they are generally followed in every state, Texas included.
An alternative interstate that allows travellers to take a route that bypasses El Paso will be called the "IH-210" as long as the standards are followed.
We already have a spur, the "IH-110", that's the bit of highway that goes south to the border bridges. The IH-410 is San Antonio's loop and the IH-610 is Houston's loop. If you notice how all the Interstates are named across the country, the numbers make sense. No need discuss it with our neighbors at all.
Ray E. G9ilbert, Jr.
July 22, 2008
I am sorry. We had no backup on this at City Council today and it turned out to be what a real El Paso Citizen could expect from our Local Government at this time. The second biggest rape the citizens will ever see. There is a real simple way to do this but the powers that be will not allow the tax and fee payers to do it. It would be a lot better and would be better controlled without any investment zones which just increase the other taxpayers tax bills and no toll road which would be forever. The alternate method would give us free roads without any additional cost out of our pockets. We pay for it either way but the way they propose is just another Enron way to do business. The Enron people went to jail. Government people just laugh about it and do not tell up the truth. As soon as I have all of the backup, I will be back to you. We have to stop this now not later.
David K
July 22, 2008
DJ,
Thanks for the elementary lesson on why they give different roads the numbers they have.
I was referring to the interconectivity of our system. You are talking about a truck bypass. Alamogordo has a very nice truck bypass I use every time I travel to Ruidoso.
And most large cities have a complete loop that goes around the city. Lubbock, San Antonio, Houston and Dallas all have the loops you say they don't have.
Of course, there's no real relief from a truck bypass when most trucks need to travel into El Paso to pick up or drop off their loads.
Rob
July 22, 2008
Who is the webmaster for this site?
It leaves so much to be desired, but currently I desire to click the thumbnailed images in the story and have them open to a larger full sized image, but no, for some reason you have the exact same size image...it would be laughable if it wasn't screaming the obvious, that you don't have a clue how to operate the admin portion of this blog system.
Oh and BTW your Contact email form STILL has the exact same mailto: error I pointed out to you in an email 3 months ago.
a 2 second fix..still not done...lol
This site has so much potential, but needs some serious help on the site admin end.
Chuco
July 23, 2008
You can see a full version of the map and detail, from the El Paso MPO website: http://www.elpasompo.org/Portals/0/2008CMP-7-18-08.pdf
william
July 23, 2008
What is 375 thought that was the loop it goes from americas to transmountian bypassing the traffic through town and the revenues they are talking about where are they to come from. 375 is there but don t see any more businesses along that route than there were to start with. Toll roads to pay for more roads who pays the tolls we do who benifits from the tolls the city. When are we going to realize we are not Dallas Houston Or any of the other major cities in Texas. Fly over any of these and see the industry We want to be like them without the industry not gonna happen. We can t have it both ways big town ideas with small town reality.
expat Al
July 25, 2008
"Highway Beautification" is an oxymoron.
So sad that money is wasted on that.