An email letter written by EPISO’s lead organizer, Kevin Courtney, that accidentally landed in city Rep. Steve Ortega’s electronic mailbox Wednesday could spell trouble for Courtney, EPISO and Project Arriba.
Obviously intended for someone in the El Paso Interreligious Sponsoring Organization’s leadership, the errant email followed Tuesday’s City Council meeting at which a the council defeated a proposal by a 4-3 vote to increase this year’s $250,000 appropriation for the Project Arriba training program by $100,000 for the year starting Sept. 1.
Ortega cast the deciding vote and then offered an alternate motion to give Arriba $25,000 more. It passed unanimously.
Just before 8 a.m. the next morning, Ortega received an email from Courtney that read: “His real reason is in today’s paper: ‘Aren’t I great … I lowered taxes!’ ”
The message, referring to Ortega, went on to say, “We need to have a way to make him promise in front of his voters before the election in May. Then we can squeeze him and/or hurt him.”
The second sentence of the message refers to an EPISO accountability session at which candidates or officeholders are brought before a large crowd of EPISO supporters from various Catholic churches, asked if they will support EPISO’s goals and are told to reply with a yes or no.
Then, in the weeks leading to an election, EPISO supporters go door to door informing potential voters of the organization’s issues and which candidates support or oppose them.
To some politicians, the accountability session is an unpopular and uncomfortable exercise, one that EPISO has used since its formation in the early 1980s.
Ortega, who went through some of the same training given to EPISO leaders while he was in law school, said he supports EPISO and particularly Project Arriba.
“But the email that Kevin Courtney apparently meant to send to Father Ed got to me,” Ortega said, referring to EPISO Co-Chair Ed Roden-Lucero, a Catholic priest. “When you talk about squeezing and hurting people, that’s not very religious.”
Ortega, who furnished that message and two companion letters to Newspaper Tree, cited Courtney’s email in a formal letter of complaint to Project Arriba’s chairman, Eduardo Rodriguez.
In the letter, Ortega said he met with Project Arriba and EPISO representatives in early July and said he would support a 10 percent, or $25,000, increase if the city could reduce its tax rate.
Ortega said kept that promise but found the Courtney’s letter distasteful.
“As you know, the tools of threat, coercion and vindictive revenge are antithetical to established religious principles,” Ortega wrote.
Ortega said he would send copies of Courtney’s letter to various officials and media outlets because “EPISO’s latest tactics need to be recorded and exposed.”
Roden, who is also the vice-chairman of Project Arriba’s board, said he feared the harm that would come to Courtney, EPISO and Arriba as a result.
The letter, he said, “was an internal communication that was misdirected and written in frustration.”
Courtney, a veteran organizer who came from an EPISO sister organization in Arizona, could not be reached for comment.
While Courtney is EPISO’s lead organizer, Roden said, the organization is run and led by its co-chairpersons, not Courtney.
“We had understood that Ortega was going to support the $100,000,” he said. “It was money we were leveraging. We could have sent 18 more people into training.
“Kevin’s remarks show our frustration that 15 people will remain in poverty because we don’t have that extra $75,000.”
Ortega responded, "That's not true. I never once committed to $100,000."
Mayor John Cook, when asked if he was surprised by Courtney’s email, said, “I was surprised that Steve was able to send a civil correspondence” to Rodriguez.
Cook, who supported the $100,000 for Arriba, said he has advised Arriba’s leaders to distance their program from EPISO and its accountability sessions.
“I told them, ‘You’ve got a legitimate organization that is involved in workforce training,’ ” Cook said, adding that U.S. Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchinson has put for $100,000 for them in a larger appropriations bill.
City Rep. Susie Byrd, who voted for the $100,000 for Arriba, said she has told EPISO leaders that the continued use of accountability sessions is a mistake.
“It’s a coercive tactic, and I think they gain a lot more by sitting down with elected officials,” she said.
EPISO, a largely church-based organization started in 1982, brought the Project Arriba concept to El Paso.
Arriba is based on a similar and successful job training and education program started in San Antonio by a sister organization, Communities Organized for Public Service, known there as COPS.
The model for EPISO and COPS, the first organization of its kind, was created by a tough community organizer, Saul Alinsky, who founded the Industrial Areas Foundation in the late 1960s as a training school for professional organizers.
Accountability sessions are a staple tactic of IAF organizations.
“There’s no other way I know that you can hold these people accountable, that you can explain a social problem, define a vision for solving that problem and get them to commit to it publicly,” Roden said. “That’s not an excuse for what has happened here. But there is a fuller story than just a frustrated email gone awry.
“It’s based on what we sometimes feel is a total lack of vision with some of our public leaders on how you reduce a 30 percent poverty rate in a major American city.
“That’s got to be part of the story too.”
***
To reach David Crowder, write to dcrowder@epmediagroup.com or call (915) 351-0605.
Related Documents:















Brownneocon
August 1, 2008
Define Irony:
Saul Alinsky’s radicalism was expressed in his 1971 book, “Rules for Radicals: A Pragmatic Primer for Realistic Radicals.” In that book, Alinsky said, “Lest we forget at least an over-the-shoulder acknowledgment to the very first radical: from all our legends, mythology, and history (and who is to know where mythology leaves off and history begins -- or which is which), the first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom -- Lucifer.”
Matt
August 1, 2008
Imagine a contractor or builder sending an e-mail to an official saying they were going to "squeeze" or "hurt" them for a vote. The FBI ought to look into this. Hopefully they still read Newspaper Tree . . .
gimme a break steve
August 1, 2008
It is just so plainly obvious that what the email meant was to "squeeze" and "hurt" Ortega politically, which is a time honored tradition in American politics. Ask Karl Rove about that why don't you. It's the American way. It has nothing to do with "religious principles." Are we that sensitive?
And what is so wrong about EPISO's "yes or no" accountability? It is obviously done to bring black and white clarity on issues to the impoverished underclass they serve. They didn't have the luxury to learn the finer arts of subtle argumentation and obfuscation with "the facts" like lawyers did.
Aren't they always prompted to view the world that way anyway, to respect the "good guys" (cops) and kill the "bad guys" (unsurgents), support the troops or be unpatriotic, love it or leave it, my way or the highway? Isn't the world presented to them as a black or white zero sum game? Why shouldn't they ask the same of their representatives?
Jerry Romero
August 1, 2008
Come on there isn’t a politician in El Paso County that doesn’t know how EPISO operates. For Ortega to respond in the manner that he did and copy all those that he did is no better then what he is complaining about. The fact of the matter is he is running for
re-election and he is going to do anything and everything to try and stay in office. Remember he is one of the majority on city council the same majority that raises taxes at the drop of a hat. Now that more and more taxpayers are shouting “NO NEW TAXES/OR HIDDEN FEES” these individuals including Ortega are seeing the writing on the wall and realized “HEY” I am running for office I better do something to appease the taxpayers and solidify my vote. Mr. Ortega can express how dismayed and hurt he is over this incident but he is no better with his underlying threats and intimidation.
Brownneocon
August 1, 2008
They're not looking for "accountability".
They are looking for your tax money... if you say no they will look for a way to "squeeze/hurt you".... which is OK.
The Low Road
August 1, 2008
This is what Barack Obama calls the "Low Road." Some of us are looking for a better kind of politics and Mr. Ortega is to be commended for his measured response to Mr. Rodriguez. NPT: Note Jerry Romero's response. We may be seeing him on a ballot soon too.
Ken G
August 1, 2008
EPISO has a religious (Roman Catholic) agenda and should not be supported by taxpayer funding. Project Arribaba may do good things but it should not be taxpayer supported. Churches supporting EPISO should lose the tax exempt status since they are involved with partisan politics.
Martin Silva
August 1, 2008
If memory serves me correctly, Representative Ortega was elected by a WHOPPING 20 VOTES, last election. Not much of a squeeze is needed.
Jenny
August 1, 2008
Good for you, Steve! EPISO continually holds the figurative gun to our politicians' heads and I'm glad they got called on it. People should vote for the candidate and the issues. When they vote for "how much they can get" democracy will cease to work. I, too, want to help people lift themselves out of poverty but I do not support EPISO's tactics. And I agree that they should not be church supported.
Edie
August 1, 2008
Steve Ortega good for you! Ortega had tremendous courage to document what happened and share it with the public. He always votes his conscience and does what he (and many of us) believes is the right thing to do. We need more politicians like Ortega.
Border Yankee
August 2, 2008
.....Sends it to Ortega.... what an idiot.
Joe Olvera
August 2, 2008
I know EPISO very well. When I first started writing for the El Paso Herald-Post in 1982, my main assignment was to cover EPISO - both pro and con. At that time, EPISO was struggling to be accepted into the churches, but there was adamant opposition. I guess I did a good job, because both the pros and the cons hated me. But, I did learn about how EPISO operates. At one point, I did agree with the tactics they perpetrated, because I could see elderly Mexican men and women holding up flags and fighting for their rights. However, later it became evident that the people were being used by being told what to do and what to say. Remember, I know. I was there.
When I ran the campaign for Richie Telles for City Rep. we went up against EPISO. They were supporting Susie Azar against Richie, despite the fact that Susie was Pro Choice, while Richie was Pro Life. I challenged EPISO on that point, meaning, of course, how could they support Azar when she went against one of the cardinal rules of the Catholic Church - no abortion. At that time, the lead organizer was Robert Rivera. When I challenged him on that point, he ignored me and, in fact, ran away from me.
Well, so much for equal representation. For EPISO to say that it is not political and that it doesn't encourage people to vote for the candidates it supports is totally beyond my ken. Of course, the organization is political, and, of course, they support specific political candidates. What a farce for the group to say that it doesn't. It's almost laughable. Yes, EPISO has done some good things, but at what cost to our community? BTW: I still support EPISO, but only to a certain extent. Those accountability sessions are laughable and ridiculous. They treat the people like children and talk down to them as if the people can't make up their own minds. Come on, EPISO, time to stop your shady operations. You can't force the city, the county, the state, or the feds to give you more than you deserve. You've got to stand in line like everybody else. Quit threatening people, as you've always done. BTW: One interesting note - if I'm not mistaken, Benjamin Saenz, the great writer, was once the spiritual leader of EPISO, when Saenz was a Catholic Priest. Remember Father Ben?
Sin Fin y que curadas
Jerry Romero
August 2, 2008
Well we know what party Low Road is from...you can change the wrapping but its still the same tired message. And no you won't be seeing me on any ballot.
Victim Steve
August 2, 2008
Look!! look!! I'm a victim!!! I'm a victim!! I'm being victimized!!!
You get your votes how you can. Right, Steve?
I am the Walrus
August 3, 2008
"Mayor John Cook, when asked if he was surprised by Courtney’s email, said, 'I was surprised that Steve was able to send a civil correspondence' to Rodriguez."
Hang on Mr. Cook, people seek elected office to serve, and to be in the spotlight. To quote a scene from The Godfather "This is the life you chose." Nobody twisted Mr. Ortega's arm when he, as other candidates, clamor for the city's attention, and he should have been fully aware of the heat that comes from serving in political office.
For you, Mr. Cook, to show such mystification for Mr. Ortega's ability to "be civil" in his correspondence to Mr. Rodriguez implies that you are not a very stalwart supporter of civility. It was totally within the arena of politics -- this arena to which Mr. Ortega aggressively placed himself -- for activist groups to have a discussion of how to "squeeze ... and/or hurt” politicians in order to secure funds and support. "Gimme a break Steve" saw through that one and appropriately referred to it as "American politics." Been done a million times before, and handled, quite frankly, much better than this particular episode.
How would you have responded, Mr. Cook? You seem surprised that Mr. Ortega responded with "civility." So I assume your response would been uncivilized. Maybe like you did with your reference to Congressman Reyes being considered a live target, using military terms for death through military means. Why? Because Reyes showed support for one of your political opponents.
If Mr. Ortega can't take a group contemplating how to politically "squeeze" him, then he has no business being involved in politics. If you, Mr. Cook, can't fathom a civilized response to what is, in the grand context of things, is a rather mundane letter, than you are too temperamental to be leading a city this size. It may help explain your clouded logic in some of the decision you have made.
The email that was "accidentally" sent to Mr. Ortega is not a big deal (how it arrived to his email is still debatable). Mr. Ortega retaliating for constituents expressing their right to politic shows the thin nature of his skin; and you, Mr. Mayor, show an extremely short fuse, which I'm sure has much to do with the current attitude of city council, which is to close their ears to their constituents and prune their egos. Well, at least they listen to part of the community -- the ones with dollars sticking out of their ears.
DJM
August 3, 2008
Given the low voter turn out rates for City representatives elections, EPISO accountability sessions may be "coercive" but of little impact. For the hundreds of EPISO attendees at these accountability sessions you would think these hundreds would pursuade thousands to vote (even just their respective congregation). It is suggested that these "attendees" are really active members of the "nation of sheep" (who will follow; just to follow; but really do not know where they are going). I have led a few herd of sheep to meetings before (just to impress politicians). Offending EPISO is like offending the unions (they hold great forums and issue endorsement) but the have little impact on the voter turnout.
DJM
Concerned Citizen
August 6, 2008
It amazes me how certain people can twist things around and go completely off course. The issue is a threat made against a person. This is not acceptable behave from anyone, let alone a "religious" organization (by the way, I'm Catholic and in no way support this group). I do not care who the threat was made against or whether you like Rep. Ortega or not or even how he received the message (though it has already been admitted by EPISO that the idiot who sent it hit "reply all" by mistake - God works in mysterious ways). Stop clouding the issue and using it to jab at Ortega or Mayor Cook. Pretty low-life.
I am the Walrus
August 6, 2008
The fact that it's a "religious" organization has nothing to do with anything. They are still constituents protected under the first amendment to express themselves and their viewpoints. There was no "threat" to either Ortega nor Cook, only a political conversation using pretty conventional political terms.
I find it odd that "Concerned" Citizen finds compassion for the mayor and political cohort receiving a "threat" when it is this same mayor who delivered what was truly a "threat" to Congressman Reyes. The fact that the mayor and city rep are politicians, who find offense at political maneuvers is not veering off track nor clouding the issue --it is the issue precisely. Calling people "idiots" and "Low lifes" is taking things off track and clouding the issue. If you used logic instead of foul words maybe you would be taken a little more serious when calling yourself a "concerned citizen."