U.S. Rep. Silvestre Reyes said Friday afternoon that "in 12 years of Congress I haven't had a normal year yet."
Still, even by the sometimes chaotic standards of lawmaking in the midst of emergency, the last week has been extraordinary.
Speaking to NPT between floor votes on unrelated bills and a caucus meeting to explain the latest in negotiations on the financial bailout plan under consideration by Congress as the U.S. financial system purportedly is on the edge of collapse, Reyes said that he heard the House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and U.S. Rep. Barney Frank, the lead Democratic negotiator, were hoping for an agreement Sunday.
Minutes later, the Associated Press reported the news conference with the headline, Rep. Barney Frank predicts bailout deal by Sunday.
"It's been an incredible week here," said Reyes.
Thursday, at a White House meeting in which it was widely thought an agreement would be reached, House Republicans proferred their own plan, and said they would not support the plan agreed upon by the White House, the Senate, and House Democrats.
"People have been all over the place on this issue all week but we were led to believe there was at least an agreement," Reyes said.
That put everything back into negotiation mode, most recently leading to the announcement Friday afternoon by Pelosi and Frank.
Meanwhile, with presidential politics at stake, candidates John McCain and Barack Obama, both senators, prepared for the debate tonight that McCain initially backed out of, saying he wanted to deal with the crisis at hand.
At the White House, accounts vary, with some blaming McCain for urging the meeting, then sitting by and saying little when the deal fell apart. Others defended his position, saying he helped instigate the process under way now that will lead to a better outcome.
The process is complicated because the idea of a bailout for firms with which most U.S. citizens are not directly connected is unpopular. While most lawmakers have said they want to transcend politics and find a solution quickly, before the financial system collapses, a strong bloc of conservative Republicans who no longer owe an allegiance to the White House conceivably could continue to hold out.
"It's incredibly hectic because there are a lot of moving parts here," Reyes said.
Reyes was quoted yesterday as saying that Democrats want at least 100 Republicans to join them.
"I don’t think it's changed," he said Friday. "I think everybody realizes that whatever package is decided on, whatever the agreement is, it has to be something that will be supported by both presidential candidates because the next administration will be inheriting this mess."
Reyes said years of Republican deregulation were to blame for the mess.
"When they were in charge they rubberstamped everything the administration put forth, including deregulation," he said. "They got to pony up and make sure this is a bipartisan effort."
The main points publicized nationally also were the areas Reyes mentioned: Limiting executive salaries for companies benefiting from the bailout and ensuring oversight of the bailout, among them.
He said while many places in the country, including El Paso, have not felt the full weight of the crisis bearing down -- although the city got a taste earlier this week when Hunt Communities pulled out of a $131 million land deal with the Public Service Board -- "We're not exempt from what the rest of the country is feeling.
"The money has considerably tightened up. People still have to get financing … there's all this atmosphere of uncertainty about the day-to-day aspects of being able to finance cars and homes," he said. "El Paso is not exempt from that."
Reyes said that the major federal project in El Paso, the expansion of Fort Bliss, would not be affected for the current year.
"But if there is a serious downturn in the economy, if there are cutbacks, we start working on the 2010 budget in March. The '09 budget is already protected, we already passed that."
He said he wasn't sure where he'd watch the debate tonight.
"I haven’t even thought that far. I'm going to the caucus see what the latest is … then we come back and take another round of votes, then we recess for the debate. We may watch at the Democratic National Committee or here in the cloakroom, depending on what's going on."















MR CK
September 26, 2008
If people like Mr. Hunt can not get financing for real estate you can imagine that the situation is worse than it looks.
Arturo
September 27, 2008
Reyes says that when the Republicans were in charge they rubber stamped everthing? That is true, but the Democratic congress has been in charge for the past 4 years and they've done NOTHING. Greed and our do nothing politicians from both political partys are to blame and now they want the taxpayers to bail them out. I say NO. We've been struggling and taking our lumps for the past 10 years, I'm sure we can survive this one also.
Mark Sanchez
September 27, 2008
Reyes is an odious partisan, more interested in blaming Republicans for everything from the housing crisis and subsequent financial mess to UTEP losing football games. As a non-high school graduate it might be harder for him to understand that this mess was not caused by GOP deregulation than by Democrats attempts to put everyone into a house, no matter whether they could afford it or not. It seems to be getting a little old for you to be blaming the GOP, Congressman, especially when you have members from your own party like Chris Dodd and Barney Frank to blame for this mess.
Ken G
September 27, 2008
People are criticizing the bailout/rescue plan that hasn't been finalized! I think the critics are a bit premature. We want to reduce foreclosures but should we reward people who bought 'too much' house? The current crisis is 'liquidity.' Our economy is based on the movement of money. No movement and the economy stagnates. The federal government should not provide handouts but they can provide loan guarantees with regulations.
Maybe the Hunt Corporation should talk to Mr. Foster.
dj
September 27, 2008
So gald he did not mention "Jutep." I still can't beleive he said that at the El Paso Hillary visit. Such an idiot.
regulate
September 27, 2008
FIrst off , CEO's should not be getting ANY money off the public. They are for profit and the funding is coming from the NON PROFIT sector: the PUBLIC.
There is something wrong with the whole thing when the 'solution" is to bail out predatory billionares who knew the risk, and still kept borrowing and lending these toxic junk securites till it ran their companies to the ground
That whole idea about deregulation with no oversight is the root of this.
Dr. J. L. Lewis
September 28, 2008
Why Can’t Americans Speak The Truth Anymore?
Why can’t the media, politicians and common everyday American Citizens speak the truth and say that the present financial crisis was caused by the enactment of the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) during the Clinton administration and the resulting enforcement thereafter, the purpose of which was to place the poor and minorities into housing which they could not legitimately afford at the expense of individual personal responsibility?
Why can’t these same groups call such loans “illegitimate loans” rather than sub-prime or Alt-A (‘liar”) loans? Why can’t anyone remember and mention how liberals in 1999 were bragging about how they had extended affirmative action to the financial sector?
Why can’t they point out that, starting in 1992, a majority Democratic Congress “mandated that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac increase their purchases of mortgages for low-income and medium income borrowers,” as reported in the Los Angeles Times?
Why can’t they point out that Clinton’s Federal Reserve demanded that banks treat welfare payments and unemployment benefits as valid income sources to qualify for a mortgage (not a joke but a fact)?
Why doesn’t someone mention that the theory behind the entire effort was based upon the shaky and irresponsible assumption that home values would always hold their own or increase?
Why don’t these same Americans call the bailout what it is —
“The Liberal-Democrat-Necessitated Bush Bailout!”
AP
September 28, 2008
Congressman Reyes, If this bailout is such a good thing for the people of this country, why do you need the Republicans to go along? Your party has a majority in both houses of congress. You have a president that is more of a democrat than a republican willing to sign this bill. Please go ahead and have your majority approve this and leave us republicans alone. If on the other hand this is is a bad deal (it is) then lets not do it. Let the banks fail. Home values should come down so that housing becomes more affordable to your constituents. What is the difference between this housing bubble and the dot.com bubble? None. So let the banks that made bad decisions fail, let the people who bought more house than they could afford, loose them. (They have no equity so ts OK to loose them) and go back to either being renters or get a smaller house. very simple... There is no need for any bailouts. And if the stock market goes down, so what? It just means that we get to buy stock at a discounted price. By the way, have you ever, ever taken a vote against your party's line?