It's just common sense. An institution like Planned Parenthood doesn't just stop operating without something being terribly wrong. As NPT contributor Vanessa Torres wrote, " I’d feel better if there’d been some warning or even a last ditch call-to-action campaign for supporters to ‘Save Our Services.’ "
There was none, and the board members who might be expected to have known about this did not talk. I called two of them; one called me back but would say nothing. I called former director Betty Hoover, who left in 2007, but she also would say little.
I asked David Crowder how to approach this, and he said the place to start would be to examine the nonprofit's tax return, called a 990. Those are the reports that the Internal Revenue Service generally requires large nonprofits to file annually, and they're supposed to be made available to the public upon request.
The last 990 available from Guidestar online is 2006. So, I went down to the Planned Parenthood offices at 1801 Wyoming, in a building that houses multiple agencies and businesses. The Planned Parenthood office is at the end of a hallway, and door was open. As I approached, a secretary who was emerging from the office shut the door behind her, stood in front of it and asked me in clipped tones, "Can I help you?"
I told her I was there for NewspaperTree.com, and wanted to see the 990s. She said OK, went inside, and Analinda Moreno, the interim director, came to the door. I had been calling her earlier in the week, but she did not return the calls.
The atmosphere was tense, as if there was some sort of audit or review taking place. Moreno let me in, then asked me to sit down.
I asked her to see the 990s. She said her first priority was to take care of Planned Parenthood's 12,000 patients and she would not be able to see me until Monday. I said, "That's OK, I just want to see the 990s."
Moreno told me, "I'll let you know when they're available."
I asked, when can I expect them. They should be available. She said, "I'll let you know when they'll be available. My first priority is the 12,000 patients."
I think that's when I sort of blew it. I told her we were looking into the possibility of fiscal mismanagement. She got defensive, said she had no idea about that, and she stood up, as though I should leave. And I did, like a dummy.
Now Crowder's upset with me, and I might have blown a scoop.
So in an effort to be transparent and new media, I'm putting this out there and will keep you updated as to the process of our little botched investigation. You might not hear from me until Monday, though, as it's holiday weekend and I'm going camping, Yocos!


LisaDfan
July 2, 2009
Darn Lisa D! Why did you have to go and admit you blew it. Now I'll have to defend you from lame comments by The Strelz!
Quick unleash that rising star in investigative reporting Jaime "The Lion Star" Abeytia on PP. He'll get the scoop, remember he speaks truth to power!
Just kidding - nice try, I am sure once you get the 990's you;ll find something fishy.
james martinez
July 2, 2009
check guidestar.org
Daniel Herrera
July 2, 2009
I completely know where you're coming from in believing that you may have blown the scoop.i myself have done so once when trying to get some information on a story with Paramount Pictures. There is always a way around the rebuttal that she gave you though. I am pretty sure you will get what you were looking for in the end.
Carl Starr
July 2, 2009
Catholic University Law Review
Spring, 2008
57 Cath. U.L. Rev. 701
LENGTH: 39896 words
ARTICLE: THE DEONTOLOGICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF NONPROFIT CORPORATE GOVERNANCE STANDARDS: A FIDUCIARY DUTY OF CARE WITHOUT A REMEDY
NAME: Carter G. Bishop *
See Reiser, supra note 22, at 568-80 (discussing various state and federal proposals for disclosure regulation of nonprofits, particularly a Senate Finance Committee discussion draft proposal that would increase the disclosures required by Form 990 in an effort to improve nonprofit accountability).
Monterey County Herald (California)
June 26, 2009 Friday
Nonprofits face new IRS form
BYLINE: Jacqueline McManus Workplace Law
SECTION: COLUMNISTS
LENGTH: 806 words
Q: I recently saw something about a new IRS form that nonprofit organizations are required to fill out, that reports on their annual activities. Is this the same as the Form 990? I run a small nonprofit and want to be sure I am in compliance. Thanks for your help!
A: Yes, it sounds like you are talking about the new IRS Form 990 that nonprofit organizations will file for tax year 2009. As you probably already know, most nonprofit, tax-exempt (or 501(c)(3)) organizations are required to file an informational return annually with the IRS, five months after the close of their fiscal year. Completing and filing the Form 990 is important for two reasons: (1) Form 990 provides the IRS with information about your nonprofit's activities and financial status in order to demonstrate that your nonprofit still meets the qualifications for tax-exemption, and (2) it informs the public about crucial aspects of your nonprofit, since most of the information is available for public inspection. This allows potential donors to look at an organization's Form 990 before making decisions about charitable giving.
The new Form 990 is different than the old one in many respects, and asks for significantly different information. The "core form" requests financial data as well as information on your organization's programs. Form 990 also includes a new section on corporate governance, which asks questions about a nonprofit's governing body, management policies, and compliance with the tax code. Organizations must also fill out a new section regarding compensation for their officers, directors, key employees, highest compensated employees, and independent contractors.
The Chronicle of Philanthropy
May 21, 2009 Thursday
Fighting Nonprofit Fraud
BYLINE: Eric Frazier
SECTION: MANAGING; Pg. 29 Vol. 21 No. 15
LENGTH: 1360 words
The true extent of the problem throughout the nonprofit world is hard to gauge. Charities often don't report their losses to the police for fear of negative publicity and adverse effects on fund raising. (After publishing a study on the issue in 2007, Ms. Greenlee says, she received hate mail.)
More data on the problem should become available as nonprofit groups file their 2008 Form 990 informational tax returns with the Internal Revenue Service; For the first time, the 2008 forms ask charities to note whether they were victims of embezzlement or theft.
Marketwire
February 10, 2009 Tuesday 11:15 AM GMT
Half a Million Nonprofits Could Lose Their Federal Tax Exemptions, GuideStar Warns;
Failure to File New IRS Form 990-N Could Lead to Loss of Exempt Status for Smaller Nonprofits
LENGTH: 428 words
DATELINE: WASHINGTON, DC and WILLIAMSBURG, VA; Feb 10, 2009
GuideStar, the leading provider of nonprofit information, reports that half a million nonprofits could find themselves stripped of tax-exempt status in May 2010.
According to IRS estimates, that's how many smaller organizations have failed to file a Form 990-N.
The Pension Protection Act of 2006 requires exempt organizations (nonprofits the IRS has designated as exempt from federal income taxes) that do not meet the income threshold for filing an annual return (IRS Form 990 or one of its variants) to provide certain information to the IRS each year. The IRS created Form 990-N for this purpose, and smaller nonprofits began filing it in 2008.
The Pension Protection Act also directs the IRS to revoke the tax-exempt status of any organization that fails to file an annual return, including the 990-N, for three consecutive years. Revocations will happen automatically beginning in May 2010.
Matthew
July 2, 2009
2006: http://www.datafilehost.com/download-97abb1e6.html
2005: http://www.datafilehost.com/download-436dd48f.html
2004: http://www.datafilehost.com/download-901afe4e.html
Erik
July 2, 2009
Potential news is not news.
another non profit
July 2, 2009
Another non profit.?????????????????????//
flor
July 2, 2009
don't beat yourself about it. the truth will come out, whether they want it to or not. something does smell very bad here.
Weak Sauce
July 2, 2009
Ummm, ok...
Thanks for the quasi-story, I guess.
Weak sauce!
Debbie Nathan
July 3, 2009
There are multiple internet sites where you can get Planned Parenthood of El Paso's 990s. They are public information and easily obtainable. No need to "ask" anyone for them, just go get 'em. Ask Crowder to help you. If it takes more than 15 minutes Crowder needs to go to an IRE training.
Debbie Nathan
Journalist and former board member, El Paso Planned Parenthood (but too long ago to know what's going on now)
Lisa Degliantoni
July 3, 2009
GuideStar doesn't have 990s for 2007 or 2008 as the tax returns for Planned Parenthood were potentially not filed for those years. In 2006, the org was $300,000 in debt according to their 990 that year. I need to see what amount the debt grew to, but can't get a hold of their latest 990.
JoseCitizen
July 3, 2009
This is not "potential" news. This IS news. The story is developing, but the fact that a non-profit did not have the 990s available upon request, as required by law, shows that there is something wrong.
That's the difference between NPT and other media in the area. They wait till others give them the story on a silver platter and then they report it. THAT is not reporting. That is lazy journalism.
THIS is what journalism is all about. Thank you LisaD!
what?
July 3, 2009
What was the point of this?
I applaud your desire to be transparent and admit that you were not as thorough as you should have been. However, your mea culpa does not strike me as sincere given your rather cavalier closing.
There's still an opportunity to find the real story here -- this is what you should be concentrating on, not camping.
DJ
July 3, 2009
Reporting 101: It's not about you Lisa!
While this might pass as a reporter's blog entry, filing this under NEWS is outright fraudulent on both you and NPT.
You "smelled something wrong". You don't report on suspicions, you report on facts.
The "atmosphere was tense". Well, it usually is when people are losing their jobs.
"I told her we were looking into the possibility of fiscal mismanagement." Well, at least you got a fact here. Problem is, it's a fact that you are looking into it. You created this fact and then you irresponsibly include it as part of a "news" story that has no news to report. Who wouldn't get defensive? This is unfair and deceitful to publish when all you really have is some half baked suspicions.
Mike
July 3, 2009
No offense Lisa, but not only did you potentially blow a scoop, but you just left NPT open to "getting scooped" by declaring your suspicions to the entire El Paso media community in print.
Perhaps the lesson from Reporting 101 here is, don't send an editor to do a reporter's job!
First, don't admit to your subject that you're hunting for something. Great way to give them a chance to possibly hide materials, and be on their guard.
If they are required to have the forms on-hand and available immediately by request, then you should have informed them of this, noting they are in "enough trouble already" and neither of you probably want "the lawyers to get involved." A little social engineering goes a long way. If the lady's "first priority is her xxx number of patients" then you should have said, "exactly, that's why I want to make this as easy as possible, now if I could just see those documents..." When she got defensive, ask point-blank, "were the documents not filed?"
Even if you walked away empty-handed, the news story could have been "Jane Doe Refuses Request for Obligatory Financial Records."
If filed, the documents may be available from the IRS? Talk to your legal advisers, but the Times and every TV newsroom is probably already sending their bloodhounds out to sniff. Sorry! :(
Investigator
July 3, 2009
Do you have a journalism degree?
thomas
July 4, 2009
it's entirely possible that the forms were not filed since the last available ones. My guess is the feds are looking into this already or soon will be. They probably also lost their non-profit status from the IRS.
One might also look at the owners/managers lifestyle, large ticket expenditures. Be interesting to see if Planned Parenthood was someone's piggy bank.
Lily
July 4, 2009
Lisa, you're an idiot.
John E Foddrill Sr.
July 5, 2009
STATE AND FEDERAL GRANT FRAUD CRIMINALS AND THEIR ACCOMPLICES STILL ON THE LOOSE.
Fraud stole millions of dollars of your hard earned tax dollars allocated by you for legitimate programs and projects. Our citizens deserve to get it back and have the crooks put away so that this fraud will finally after 30 years end. .................
City of San Antonio Chief Information Officer Richard Varn, IT Director Hugh Miller, city attorney Deborah Klein, city attorney Mark Kosanovich, IT Manager Deborah Segovia, IT Manager Diana Gonzalez, IT/HR rep Kelly Gray, IT employee Barbara Moore, IT employee Aida Anguiano, HR rep Steve Harrison and some other corrupt city employees were last seen in the 57th Bexar County Courtroom of Judge Antonia Arteaga where the committed perjury, subornation of perjury and obstruction by presenting a fraud upon the court to hide criminal activity inside City government................................
They have committed or assisted in the unlawful cover-up of corruption, misappropriation of city funds, grant fraud, falsification of government documents, etc..............................
Accomplices Police Chief William ( Mein Furher) McManus and City Attorney Michael ( Mein Kampf) Bernard employed the Nazi storm trooper tactic of having two blue-shirts hand deliver a “Criminal Trespass Warning” to honest citizen John E. Foddrill Sr. (former City of SA Telecommunications Manager) at his home banning him from City Hall, Municipal Plaza and other city sites. They then confiscated all incriminating evidence from City Council chambers and instructed city council not to speak with the citizen.............................................
Go to : http://forums.mysanantonio.com/forums/ubbthreads.php/forums/1/1/Current_News........
City Employees – Perjury/Obstruction/Fraud to get all the facts..........
Then contact your elected officials, law enforcement, and media..............
Vanessa
July 6, 2009
IRS does not list the organization as having lost its exemption, though perhaps list simply hasn't been updated.
http://www.irs.gov/charities/charitable/article/0,,id=141466,00.html