In addition to editing and writing for NPT, I am a radio host on 1650 AM KHRO (11 a.m.-noon weekdays). About two weeks ago, I was talking about energy use, and Bill Addington called.
Addington is a true character, a native of West Texas and El Paso who is involved in political and environmental issues. He deeply loves the desert and the border, so much so that his life turned into a single-minded crusade against the low-level nuclear waste dump in Sierra Blanca in the 1990s. There were and are other issues involving clean air, soil and water.
Addington had a simple comment. Sito, he said, if you want to save energy, there is something very easy you can do.
Just drive 55.
The 55 mph speed limit was passed as a reaction to the havoc wreaked by the 1973 oil embargo. I don’t remember it – it was a generation or two ago, depending how you measure generations -- but I have seen the photos of cars lined up at gas stations. At its worst, people waited hours for a fill-up, which happened again in 1979. We haven’t had a similar energy crisis since.
There’s some dispute about how much fuel ultimately was saved. Traffic fatalities did go down. Congress passed fuel efficiency rules, small cars gained stature. But drivers chafed, and as oil flowed and the memory of 1973 faded, speed limits went up. Sammy Hagar hit it big in 1984 with “I Can’t Drive 55.” In 1987 the federal government raised the limit to 65 (Hagar did a remake of his song, “I Can’t Drive 65,” but it just didn’t seem right) and in the 1990s the federal government gave power back to the states to set speed limits.
Bill and I went back and forth a little bit. I drive a bit on the aggressive side – safe, but assertive – and I always seem to be a few minutes behind. And on road trips, forget it. But Bill was persuasive, especially when he pointed out that with an in-city commute, it really didn’t make much difference time-wise if you drive 55 or 70 mph.
Ok, I said, I’ll try it. Not on the open road, driving across the open Southwest. But in the city? Ok, I’ll try it.
But habits are habits. I gunned the engine as I pulled out of the lot onto Mesa after the show. They used to call that a “rabbit start.” Then I remembered the idea of driving 55; my hands loosened on the wheel, the tension in my face and shoulders eased slightly.
I might have pulled out the cell phone and started talking. I don’t remember, but I talk a lot while I’m driving, so it’s likely. Habits are habits, and when I turned right onto Executive and then left to the onramp toward Downtown, I gunned the engine again.
Before I knew it, I was rolling down the onramp and merging with traffic, already doing 60 and heading for the usual 65-70 mph. I remembered 55 again, and, with some effort, slowed down.
Some effort?
Here’s a quick game. It will sound a bit odd, but just do it. Then you’ll see what I mean.
Clench your fists as tight as you can. Do the same with your butt. Hold it for 10-20-30 seconds, if you can.
How do you feel?
See, I believe many of us, maybe even most of us, are driving around clenched, faces tight and bodies leaning forward. We’re breathing hard. We’re weaving in and out of traffic, trying to get one extra car length ahead of the other driver.
At 55, I relax a little. I stay to the right, and 55 is fast enough to be in the flow of traffic. I’m a little more alert to the traffic around me, as opposed to looking ahead at the next vehicle to pass.
And I noticed that the last tank of gas got 10-15 percent more mileage. I’m about halfway through the second tank since I started driving 55, and the increased mileage looks to be a trend.
We’re a sleep-deprived, drugged-up, caffeinated, fast-forward society that burns about a quarter of the world’s oil. One of the things we do most of is drive.
So if there is a little thing I can do to conserve a resource that fuels world conflict, creates pollution and powers the vehicles in which about 43,000 people died in 2006, and it helps me be a slightly better driver to boot, well, the question answers itself.
As it turns out, I can drive 55. I bet you can, too.
















Mark Moses Alvarado
April 6, 2008
Driving 55 is a good thing but it seems out of place on I-10. Where roadsters click at 65 to 75 most of the time. So then let's find four people who will agree to drive in each lane of I-10 together at 55. You'll create a riot behind you. But it would be a great test to demonstrate that the flow of traffic will not support 55 becuz society is borderline nuts, though it would be fun to try. Any volunteers?
Ken G
April 6, 2008
A friend of mine wanted to buy my car. So, I got serious about finding a replacement. I looked at a Cadillac CTS but had to admit it was too much car for my low-mileage driving. I lowered my sights a bit and ended up with a Toyota Prius. I really enjoy getting 50 MPG!
Matt Platte
April 6, 2008
Welcome. I've been driving 55 for quite a while in my diesel-powered, 1991 VW Jetta: 55 mpg. On the two-lane highways of Kansas and Nebraska I drive about 50 mph which will often produce 55+ miles per gallon.
Henry
April 6, 2008
At 55 mph, you are driving 15 mph slower than the natural flow of traffic. The roads were designed for 70 mph minimum. I have tried to drive 55 mph, but can't. Therefore I won't. Europeans, who have always paid twice as much for gasoline as we do, don't either. They don't drive with clenched fists, they are paying attention. The reason people drive around here with clenched fists or whatever the feel-good psychobabble psychologist types call it is because idiots won't move out of the left-lane as a courtesy. When I drive a little slower, I make sure that i"m not in the left lane blocking traffic. If you want to go 55 mph, make sure you stay in the right lane.
Jim Walker
April 6, 2008
On Michigan freeways, including the better urban ones, 55 mph is NOT in the traffic flow. It puts you in about the bottom 15% of traffic on urban freeways and the bottom 5% of traffic on rural ones. This raises your accident risk by more than 5 times, compared to driving in the main traffic flow pattern of about 71-80 mph.
55 is also now the legal minimum speed on Michigan freeways that are posted at 70 mph.
Karen
April 6, 2008
When I had a diesel Jetta wagon in the early 2000s, I decided to conduct an unscientific test. Instead of the 70 mph I usually drove, I set my cruise control at 60 mph and stayed mostly in the right lane of I-10 traffic. Just like Mr. Negron experienced, my miles per gallon increased about 10%. And, I was not any more late to appointments than I always was. And, driving became less stressful.
Casey
April 6, 2008
I'm all for less stress on the roads, and if going 55 in the right lane (PLEASE) works for you, then great.
I prefer to go slightly faster than the pack. I greatly dislike drivers who are under the impression they have a deed to their lane, or worse, that their cell phone conversation is primary.
Our roads are set up for 70 mph speeds, assuming a car of the 50's. Today's cars are much better, and I only ask that you stay right for slower traffic.
Lilia
April 6, 2008
I tried driving 65 on I-10 tonight, and almost got wiped out by an 18-wheeler doing 80.
I wonder if he was part of the protest over high fuel prices that constipated I-10 this weekend.
LisaT
April 7, 2008
Since you admit to talking on the phone while driving let me give you this little hint that will cut your gas usage to nearling nothing. Take a BUS. If you are talking on a phone and driving you are endangering everyone else on the road.
T
April 7, 2008
If we did this, thing about. Not everyone is goinbg to drive 55. So, just like know, we can all see cars with Juaerz licesnse driving slow to save gas,(I guess to to save a few peso) this is so annoyying!!. If you cant afford the gas, sell the car, this is what I tell them.
If you cant drive the Texas mandated speed limit , b/c you low on cash, Take the bus!
Rob
April 7, 2008
55? Too damn slow! Lack of oil is not the problem. Lack of refineries to convert it to gasoline is the problem. We should all be in favor of new forms of energy, but right now we need to help Americans by making it cheaper and easier to make gasoline. Our few refineries in operation are behind the technology curve by atleast 3 decades and their capabilities are completely maxed out. We as a nation better wise up.
PS - Mr Addington is the emptiest of cans with the most rattle ever to come out of Sierra Blanca. Ask someone from Sierra Blanca what they think of this El Paso media darling and you likely wouldn't be able to print their response.
Berdie
April 9, 2008
As long as you 55ers stay to the right everything will be ok.
dave
July 11, 2008
The added labor costs to business paying for employees being on the road 28% longer is far above the savings in gas. That added expense will ultimately result in increased prices of all goods and services.
55MPH will be very detrimental to the economy. Yes, many vehicles do get up to 27% better gas mileage at 55 MPH as compared to 75 MPH. However you are also driving 28% slower at 55 MPH. A 100 mile trip takes all most 30 minutes longer at 55MPH as compared to 75MPH.
For the sake of discussion, let's use the following parameters for a 100 mile trip: A car that gets 25 MPG would get 31.75 MPG at 55 MPH (27%) - Gas at $4.00 per gallon - Employee labor cost of $15 per hour.
Driving at 75MPH will take 80 minutes and cost a total of $36.00 in gas and labor costs
( use 4 gallons of gas at a cost of $16.00 and the labor cost would be $20 (1.3 hours x $15/hour))
Driving at 55MPH will take over 109 minutes and cost a total of $39.87 in gas and labor costs
( use 3.15 gallons of gas at a cost of $12.60 and the labor cost would be $27.27 (1.8 hours x $15/hour))
THAT’S AN 11% INCREASE IN COSTS BY SLOWING DOWN TO 55MPH. The burden labor rate for many service industries is actually $25 to $ 35 and more and therefore the problem is even worse.
The saving lives argument has also be very exaggerated. The chances of being involved in an accident on the highway increase the longer you are actually exposed to the risk. In other words, if you are on the highway an additional 30 minutes per day, your exposure to potential risk has been increase 30 more minutes. Being on the road longer also greatly increases driver fatigue. Driving while sleepy is as dangerous as driving drunk.
The claims that the National Highway death toll went down around 1974 due to the 55 MPH limit imposed after the 1973 Oil crisis has often been disputed. It has been suggested that this drop was actually due to new enforcement of seat belt laws and people driving less because of high gas prices.
As a business owner of a service industry, the interference by the Federal Government to make me inefficient will cost me thousands of dollars. Those who want to drive at 55 are more than welcome to drive 55. Just don't make everyone else along with the economy slow down with you!