The border patrol (now called Immigration and Customs Enforcement) recently announced, if a major catastrophe struck the Rio Grande Valley, it would screen people for citizenship or legal residency before letting them flee the Valley for shelter. ICE said it would take evacuees into custody who could not prove their legal status in the country. The press conference in Harlingen where this bizarre public statement occurred seemed like something scripted for a Franz Kafka novel.
A mental picture of the chaos and confusion that ICE immigration roadblocks would cause in a hurricane evacuation is had enough to imagine, let alone the cogency of the government’s thought process.
I’ve been through hurricanes in the Valley. When a hurricane is coming, it’s time to leave, and leave quickly. Traffic becomes clogged enough without the border patrol setting up checkpoints and further snarling the traffic and exposing families to harm and danger.
Even more to the point, many people who already know of the border patrol’s history of loose interpretation and capricious enforcement of the law may decide not flee the environmental danger. They would rather ride it because they fear having to deal with ICE agents.
What happens if everyone a family has status in the country, except perhaps for a grandparent? That family is going to stay put, rather than risk the grandparent’s arrest. That, in turn, exposes the entire family to peril.
The border patrol’s argument is that terrorists take advantage of sudden natural calamities to sneak into the country. Not a single shred of proof for that assertion. The terrorists who have struck this country are either homegrown (Oklahoma City, for example) or have come into the country through airports and then trained here through the incompetence of the federal government.
Imagine how much worse Hurricane Katrina would have been for the residents of New Orleans if ICE agents had set up immigration roadblocks when families were abandoning the city, before and after devastation. Or, in 1998, when Del Rio residents had to escape the sudden killer flood caused by Tropical Storm Charley.
This new policy is more lame-brained than the Department of Homeland Security building a wall through people’s property along the border. The feds hardly can get their act together in an emergency disaster, let alone adding a layer of immigration barricades to everything else going on.
In this country, we have not before required proof of citizenship before the police will act to investigate a crime. Nor do firefighters stand in front of someone’s burning home, waiting for proof of legal status before putting out the fire. Nor do ambulance attendants make legal status a prerequisite of emergency care. And it should not be a requirement for people fleeing a catastrophic act of nature.
Harrington is director of the Texas Civil Rights Project, a nonprofit foundation that promotes civil rights and economic and racial justice throughout Texas.














Brittanicus
May 16, 2008
Only unrelenting American patriots can stop the move towards any AMNESTY. State laws such as Arizona, Georgia, Oklahoma and Rhode Island has shown that by closing the doors to illegal immigrants, their unemployment rate was reduced. With illegal aliens fleeing these states, predator employers have had to hire legal citizens and green card holders. Here is an amazing revalation of Arizona economic prosperity!
(http://mensnewsdaily.com/2008/05/15/striking-changes-in-arizona-as-illegal-immigrants-flee-the-state/#comment-62672 ) Just read this disturbing revelation of costs, that our government skims from our paycheck to pay an illegal Paul. (www.eagleforum.org/sources)
There is a urgent call to today Leading Democrats, trying to force on the American public another AMNESTY. Go here to read about this current travesty of Immigration laws. This will give millions of aliens, fast access to your tax dollars in welfare payments. You decide at WWW.numbersusa.com. Toll free your Democratic representative at 202-224-3121 )
Anthony
May 16, 2008
We've sunk to a new low when our government is exploiting disasters to purge undocumented residents for it's borders. We are more humane to those in disasters across the globe (e.g. Burma, China) than we are on our own soil.
At some point, we as a county must have a real debate about our values -- something beyond the "rule of law" argument (e.g. "We're just enforcing the law," as if it were handed down from the heavens). We all believe in "rule of law" just as we all believe in "states rights" (e.g. Federalism).
The real question is, a "law" that does what? A state's "right" to do what? During the Civil War it was the "right" to own slaves. Today's immigration "law" is founded in discrimination based on a national-origin test (which, in the end, translates to the color of your skin).
Again, what are we doing with this "law" and what does it say about our values?
Cathy Barnes
May 16, 2008
Sounds like the disaster plan used by the junta in Myanmar.
Jose B
May 16, 2008
Brittanicus,
What has your comment got to do with this article?
I agree, they are here illegally. But why do you people believe this is a crime deserving of a death sentence?
jim berry
May 18, 2008
I believe that we should always follow the rules, for without them we would not have order and predictability. People enjoy life when they know what is happening and that there are rules in place to bring order and protect them. However............ when there is a fast moving natural disaster coming, it is allowable to make some adjustments in policy! We just thought about this very idea a week ago in south eat Asia, when America was appalled that it had to apply for visas in order to provide considerable and necessary diaster assistance. I believe that people are still going to have to continue thinking and making on the spot decisions. You cant make hard and fast rules to cover every possibility.
Border Yankee
May 18, 2008
I think its a great idea, and they should request proof of citizenship if they want to. (If for nothing else, they shoul do it just to point out to the "un-doc'd" that the weather is better in their mother-land)
N. Chamberlain
May 18, 2008
Here's another "law" that people just had to follow -- you know, to keep order in the world: Fugitive Slave Law of 1850
From Wikipedia: "The Fugitive Slave Law or Fugitive Slave Act was passed by the United States Congress on September 18, 1850, as part of the Compromise of 1850 between Southern slaveholding interests and Northern Free-Soilers. This was one of the most controversial acts of the 1850 compromise and heightened Northern fears of a 'slave power conspiracy'. It declared that all runaway slaves be brought back to their masters."
I know, Border Yankees and such issue the knee-jerk question: "And what does this have to do with immigration?" My answer: "Think about it." (The key verb being "Think.")
Brown Cracker
May 18, 2008
I couldn't agree with you more, Border Yankee. If we are to provide assistance, why NOT ask for citizenship. This will not only ensure that those deserving receive the much needed assistance, but will also serve as an effective deterrant to crime and exploitation of our government's financial resources. This is a no-brainer. Make sure that those deserving RECEIVE that which they so desperately NEED.
Proud Amerian
May 19, 2008
James Harrington is an idiot. ICE is not the same agency as USBP. The Patrol Agents are not forcing people to stay in the Hurricanes path. They are simply offering safe shelter, food and water until illegal aliens can be safely transported to their country or origin. The USBP gives better treatment to IA's than local law enforcement treats USC's in drunk tanks.
William
May 19, 2008
Mr Harrington your article seems a bit one sided you seem to think the ice agents are only there to go after the illegals from Mexico. Your non profit is for civil rights economic and racial justice throughout Texas. When did Texas citizens have a problem with ice agents. Or did Texas become a part of Mexico, Panama, South America, Etc. You would think your non profit would like the help of the ice agents, if they send one illegal back to their country then one of those your trying to promote might have a job or the right to it.
James
June 20, 2008
ICE is not the Border Patrol. ICE stands for Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Their job is the interior of the U.S.
The Border Patrol is under CBP (Customs and Border Protection).
Do a liitle fact checking before writing an article.