Owners of backyard swimming pools, spas and hot tubs in El Paso may start feeling pretty hot over an ordinance City Council approved Tuesday requiring them to raise the walls or fences around their homes and to make other potentially costly changes.
Pool builders didn’t like one part of the measure that would require their customers to pay the added costs of raising the rock walls or fences around their houses or fences around pools from the standard four feet high to five feet.
And not all the parents who were present in support of tighter measures liked what the council did either. Some of them had lost children of their own in swimming pool drownings.
“We would have liked it a little stricter,” said Eddie Castle, a member of the Be Watersafe coalition that attended the meeting.
He said he wanted to see a requirement for a five-foot-high fence around backyard pools rather than allowing the primary backyard walls or fences on three sides and the house on the fourth to suffice.
Castle said there have been 13 child drownings in El Paso since 2003. Only later did he disclose that he and his wife lost their small son in a pool drowning 1-1/2 years ago.
“I didn’t want it to be about us,” he said, referring to his part in the council’s discussion.
After the meeting, Eastridge/Mid-Valley city Rep. Steve Ortega agreed with Castle and said he would propose a reconsideration of the ordinance to require a five-foot, secondary fence around new pools and existing pools that cease to be protected by grandfather provisions.
“Statistics show a fence reduces child drownings by up to 90 percent,” Ortega said, adding that the primary fence or wall around a backyard won’t save the life of a child living in or visiting a house.
His motion to require a secondary fence failed on a 3-4 vote.
Then by a 4-3 vote, the council approved the ordinance as it was presented, with a change proposed by South West city Rep. Beto O’Rourke, who added a grandfather provision to keep the requirements from applying to existing residential pools unless:
* A child under 6 years old becomes a resident of the home.
* There is a change in use or character of the house, such as being used as a daycare center.
* A new pool or spa is installed on the property or additions are made to the existing pool or spa.
The ordinance applies to permanent and nonpermanent outdoor pools, spas and hot tubs that are in-ground, above-ground or on the ground more than two-feet deep, including wading pools.
Where a house serves as part of the barrier, a five-foot high primary or secondary wall or fence will not be required if the pool is equipped an keyed, power-operated cover or screen.
In addition:
* Doors leading from the house or guest room into a yard with a swimming pool must swing away from the pool, be self closing, and self-latching and equipped with a locking device that is at least 4-1/2 feet off the ground.
* Windows facing a pool must also have a latching device 54 inches above ground.
* Sliding glass doors facing a pool must have an automatic closing and locking system.
Other changes were approved to keep children from being trapped underwater by suction from drainage and filtration systems.
Voting for the measure were O’Rourke, Westside Rep. Ann Lilly, Eastside Rep. Rachel Quintana and West-Central Rep. Susie Byrd. Voting no were Ortega, Northeast Rep. Melina Castro, and East Valley Rep. Eddie Holguin. [Editor's note: The vote was incorrectly listed and was corrected at 1 p.m. Thursday April 3]
“I don’t think we should be regulating what people do in their homes,” Holguin said.
Larry Nichols of the city’s Development Services Department said many cities have similar pool safety ordinances because drowning in home pools is a top cause of accidental deaths among very young children.
Fire Department Assistant Chief Manuel Chavira said he and his department strongly supported the additional safety requirements and urged the council to require fences to be five-feet high even though the vast majority of cities use the four-foot standard.
“We don’t want to follow the national status quo,” he said. “We want to show the city of El Paso cares about our children.”
Phoenix recently imposed a requirement for five-foot secondary fences around pools.
Patrick Tarwater, an assistant professor of Public Health at the El Paso regional campus of the UT School of Health and an adjunct assistant professor at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, referred to himself as a “surviving parent” when he addressed the council in support of a stronger ordinance.
Citing statistics on child drownings and noting that 70 percent of drownings in the country happen in pools, he said barrier fences work.
“I’m here as an expert,” he said. “This is what I do. El Paso is no different than Phoenix or Tucson. I plead with you to pass this.”
His wife, Julie Tarwater, then told the council that they lost their 2-1/2 year old daughter in a pool drowning that happened in less than five minutes when she wandered unnoticed into their back yard and fell in the pool.
Westsider Lisa Turner said requiring people to build fences or raise the height of the around their yard by a foot “is going too far” and encroaches on people’s property rights.
“At some point, the government has to get out of our lives,” she said to a smattering of applause from one side of the council chambers.
Larry Davidian, a representative of Desert Sun Pools, said his company could not disagree with the city’s intent or proposals, except for the requirement to raise fence or wall heights from four feet to five feet.
He said a secondary fence is an option that 90 percent of pool buyers turn down.
A representative of Silver Springs Pool and Spa said they too are largely in favor of the ordinance.
“We believe raising a rock wall 12 inches won’t help,” he said.
Mayor Pro-Tem Susie Byrd presided at the meeting in the absence of Mayor John Cook, who was out of town.
In other business, the council:
* Approved the Parks and Recreation Department’s recommendation that the city use $4.5 million approved by voters in 2000 for a regional soccer complex on to expand add fields and lighting at Westside soccer complex and to light a set of soccer and an adjacent baseball four-plex in the Northeast. City Manager Joyce Wilson said the city can end up with 16 tournament-grade fields, 12 of them lighted and a lighted baseball complex in far less time than it would take to explore the possibility of building soccer fields on airport property. Voting no were Castro, Holguin and Quintana.
* Deleted Ortega’s proposed discussion of a rental inspection program to”promote health, safety and welfare in rental housing.”
* Approved a one-week postponement of Holguin’s discussion and action item “asking El Paso Water Uilities to hold public informational meetings in order toexplain to the citizens of El Paso how the new water rates are calculated.”
***
David Crowder can be reached at dcrowder@epmediagroup.com or at 351-0605















Mary Russell
April 2, 2008
Hi David,
I'm happy that you are with Newspaper Tree. I love to read it. I have a swimming pool in my backyard with a fence around it 6 or 7 feet high. We added the extra height when we built our pool over 20 years ago. We did not want any child in the neighborhood to drown in our pool. My greatest fear has always been that a grandchild would drown at our house. Fortunately, that never happened. Now our great-grandchildren enjoy the pool when they visit us. Their parents are very conscientious and stay with them whenever they are in the backyard. My question is how many children have drowned in their own parent's pool, how many in grandparent's pool, how many at the city pools, how many at the Y pools, and how many at a friend's pool???
Thanks,
Mary Russell
Correct the record
April 2, 2008
"Voting for the measure were Ortega, O’Rourke, Westside Rep. Ann Lilly and West-Central Rep. Susie Bryd. Voting no were Northeast Rep. Melina Castro, Eastside Rep. Rachel Quintana and East Valley Rep. Eddie Holguin."
I believe if you check the record, or the El Paso Times for that matter, you'll see that Ortega voted against the new ordinance, and Quintana voted for it. Please correct.
Gene
April 2, 2008
If YOU have a pool.... and a child, then YOU are responsible
for what happens in YOUR pool.
And if you don't keep other's and other's children out of
YOUR pool, YOU should be totally responsible for the safety
of your pool. If YOU allow a death to occur in YOUR pool you
should be charged for some kind of mansalugher, as well as
a financial responsibility for the death occured.
A Pool is a weapon. It is a loaded gun for children.
It is an unlocked car with the keys in the ignition and the car
running with a sign to invite children to drive that car.
That's the kind of responsibility I am talking about.
A Loaded Gun?
April 2, 2008
A pool is not a loaded gun, or a car for that matter. It is a pool... It is designed for recreation (not for self-defense or transportation)...
I believe in being a responsible pool owner, having adequate safety measures in place and having a lot of insurance... Keep kids safe but be reasonable...
A Loaded Gun?
April 2, 2008
A pool is not a loaded gun, or a car for that matter. It is a pool... It is designed for recreation (not for self-defense or transportation)...
I believe in being a responsible pool owner, having adequate safety measures in place and having a lot of insurance... Keep kids safe but be reasonable...
Doctor
April 2, 2008
I agree, that for a child, a pool is like a gun
and the water is ammunition.
It will kill. But, looks so safe.
Marty
April 2, 2008
A pool is as deadly as a loaded gun for a child.
If you have a pool, you better buy LOTS of insurance
and pre-paid lawyer services.
Correction
April 2, 2008
The Tarwater drowning occurred in a grandmother's swimming pool.
Alberto Rivas
April 3, 2008
What is missing either in your account of this new ordinance or in the Council's debate over it is any data indicating that a five foot fence is any safer than the typical four foot fence. Anybody with half a brain would agree that a fenced-in pool is safer for toddlers; but what difference does one foot of extra fencing make? Are toddlers only that agile that an extra foot of rock climbing will deter them and there curiosity? I don't get it. The whole thing simply sounds like pork barrel legislation for the rock companies, Jobe Concrete or Cemex or whomever it is that is currently in charge of the methodical destruction of Mt. Franklin (for all the extra rock wall). I weep for the mountain.
Ken G
April 3, 2008
Holguin is starting to gain some traction
James E. Bates, Jr.
April 4, 2008
I have a problem with our city council being so patriarcal as to think they can legislate our lives to prevent every possible disaster. The loss of a child in a backyard pool is tragic, and the homeowner should be held responsible for such a tragedy if they maintain their pool in a manner to invite such a tragedy. However, for the city council to define what constitutes adequate safety measures means that when such a tragedy occurs (and it will) in a pool that has the defined measures installed, the city becomes liable for such a tragedy and the homeowner will be held harmless. I personnally think that this sort of thing is properly decided in our courts, which is their function in our society, and not by trying to legislate the solution. Our government is meant to serve us, not the obverse.
Concerned
April 4, 2008
I moved here from Phoenix and it was a requirement to have a secondary fence around pools. We had one along with child locks on the doors. Their were as many as 12 drownings a summer in Phoenix. We had friends who lost their 2 year old at a party with no secondary fence. It was awful. Could you live with yourself if a child drowned in your pool?
If we can save 1 life it's worth it. Shame on you who think being responsible means having good insurance. This is a person's life!!! Being responsible means taking every measure to protect human life.
I have a neighbor with 3 small children and they have a completely unguarded pool. They leave their 4 foot gate open from time to time, I have a small child and it terrifies me.
We were required to have 6 foot walls in Phoenix with latches at the top of the gate. Kids couldn't jump the wall and play when you weren't around nor could they see in the backyard to tell if you had a pool. These 4 foot fences are a joke, a 4 year old could jump them! My child is 2 and she is already 3 feet, think about it! I am all for strict enforcement. I would like to see El Paso stand behind their family values! We are a very family friendly community and it's time to make sure our families come first!
Ken G
April 5, 2008
This seems really stupid. These rules seem only to apply to parents with children under six. How does the City know the age of children? The higher fence requirement seems to be designed to keep others children out. How will these requirements be enforced? It seems like these are 'after the fact' enforcements. If a neighbor kid climbs a wall be it four of five feet high and then drowns in your pool. You are liable? What about the parents who let them run loose? We don't have children but neighbor kids have scambled over our wall to retreive a ball. Their parents could raise the wall or add a net. They 'castle law' allows owners to shoot strangers on their property. I warned these little girls that they should call me (numbered provide) and that I would return their errant balls.
Jeff
April 5, 2008
A fence around the pool is a good idea just be sure the barrier meets certain criteria. I recommend to my customers an ornamental aluminum or vinyl fence. Most manufacturers have styles designed especially for pools. Pay particular attention to your gate. It needs to be self closing and self latching. In December of 2007 a national pool code was signed into law. For more information on this pool barrier law please visit my blog, http://blog.fencemax.com .
Enrique Medrano
April 6, 2008
When our daughter was about 15 months old, our 8 year old son, who could swim, left the back door wide open and my daughter walked out and into the back yard. I would always check on my daughter when she walked into the part of the house that led to the back door. I checked, saw the back door open and found her standing on the pool deck. Needless to say, I put up barriers to prevent my daughter from being able to get near the pool again. That was 27 years ago and my daughter now teaches at Eastwood Middle School. I am ever mindful of the tragedy that could have happened that day and thank God it didn't.
The requirements that City Council passed regarding the back doors and the windows that lead to the yard with the pool are reasonably calculated to help prevent a small child from accessing the yard and the pool without his or her parent's or caretaker's knowledge. How will these requirements be enforced? Will the Fire Department be making annual checks of all the homes with pools to make sure the hardware is installed and operating properly?
Despite these measures, ultimately, it is the parents' or caretaker's responsibility to anticipate, watch out for, and prevent the child from getting hurt or killed, whether by falling into a pool, by getting run over by a vehicle backing out of the driveway, or by being led out of a store by a stranger. Even with the hardware installed on back doors and pool yard windows, parents and caretakers cannot stop being vigilant for their children's safety.
There have been reported drownings of children during parties when there are several adults around the pool. No one noticed the child go underwater until it was too late. The measure passed by City Council would not have prevented a drowining under these circumstances.
Why not require parents and caretakers to put life preserver jackets on their small children when the children will be near the pool? Why not require pool owners to have life preserver jackets available for visitors with small children? Such a measure would be reasonably calculated to prevent these types of drownings.
The requirement that the rock wall around a yard with a pool be raised to 5 feet cannot be said to be reasonably calculated to prevent a small child who lives in or is visiting the home from drowning in the pool. It appears to be aimed at other children in the neighborhood. In other words, "I want you to have to spend your money to raise your wall, so that my child won't be tempted or able to go into your pool." The heavy financial burden has been placed on the wrong parties by City Council.
Joel M.Cohen
April 12, 2008
A very prudent and responsible action by your city leaders. In the Pensacola area, we lost 6 children to backyard pool drownings in 2007. We have formed a taskforce to educate and legislate. Your input is welcome. Thanks. Joel Cohen www.floridapoolsafety.com